Facebook Users Get a Big Shock With BigSight

BigSight Logo

Initially, this post was a knee jerk reaction

Since being contacted by the developers, and having a second, third and fourth look, I have come to realize that the Bigsight website, as it is at present, is not a bad idea.

Having all your profiles located in one place for people to see is not such a bad idea, and if that is all there is to this site, then I don’t have a problem with it.

I apologize to the developers, Dan Birdwhistell and Ben Sinclair, for any offense that I may have caused.

Having Said All That…

I would encourage anyone anywhere at anytime, to stop and think before filling in any personal details on any site.

My profile on Bigsight was built from publicly available information. Information that I had made publicly available on Facebook and other sites.

It is imperative that you protect your own privacy, and only include information that you are comfortable with others seeing.

I will state though that I am far less comfortable with the activities of a site such as Wink.com

You can find my post about Wink here!

Now, as I painfully remove my foot from my mouth, read on…

BigSight Aims to Become White Pages of Web Pulls Data from Facebook screamed the headline from Techcrunch, dated January 7, 2008.

I’d gone there after doing a Google search following a Google Alert that I had received this morning.

My Facebook profile had been taken and used to create a profile on BigSight.Org. The profile has since been deleted.

The Techcrunch article mentions the fact that BigSight also has a Facebook Application.

Now the concept does have merit.

In its present form and purpose in trying to become the ‘white pages’ of the Internet there doesn’t seem to be a problem.

My initial reaction was caused by the fact that the profile had been built without my knowledge.

If I had added the application on Facebook, I would have had the option of not adding it, or blocking it.

Obviously though, I do have a number of profiles around the place, and this site simply put them all in one place.

My main concern was lack of choice

After checking the Facebook terms of service, I found that no rules had been broken. This was my public profile and it could also be found on Google.

My main concern then was the lack of choice. As I mentioned elsewhere though, the opt out option has been simplified.

I understand that material on the web site has been rewritten, so as to prevent negative reactions like mine.

This is one of those situations where we can become a ‘prisoner of our own device’ by agreeing to Terms of Service without checking all details thoroughly.

Interestingly, I was involved in a conversation with another blogger when I first saw this.

I had been trying to encourage him to stick with Facebook, rather than deleting his account.

The point that I make over and again is simply that limiting the amount of information that you put into the public domain is the best way to safe guard your privacy.

You can see what I am talking about regarding being a prisoner of our own device by going to You Can Check Out Any Time You Like…

Keep An Eye On Who Is Using Your Name

This incident enforces my view of the value of Google Alerts.

They enable you to watch for mention of your name, website address or other information online.

You can set a number of alerts if you wish, and use them to track these details at set intervals.

To set up your own alert, go to Google Alerts!

Similar Posts

3 Comments

  1. Allan,

    Thanks for your post this morning, but I feel as though I need to respond given that we care deeply about these issues and I want to both clear up some errors in your post and also point out some unanswered questions.

    1. You are wrong that we in any way touched Facebook in order to obtain this basic information (name, picture, network, UID) about you. If you look at your privacy settings on Google, you’ll notice that you’ve enabled what is called a “public profile”. You can see it here: http://www.facebook.com/people/Allan_Cockerill/768551039. These public profiles are injected into the public web, appear in public search engines, and are therefore cached by myriad sites across the web.

  2. Just because something is public doesn’t make it public domain. Facebook doesn’t own your profile image, and google doesn’t appear to cache it. (Check your google cached facebook profile; the images don’t go to a google db, they go back to fb.) Enabling some small element of your facebook profile for public viewing doesn’t give blanket permission to start ups to snag your data, copy it, and reproduce it. What bigsight did wasn’t a cache. They took the information and created a new site to represent you, without even having you agree to any TOS whatsoever.

    This isn’t what web 2.0 should be. And just because these guys want their site to grow doesn’t mean they have a right to harvest our information, misrepresent us, and clutter up google searches.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.